Last night, I attended an event at the Royal Institution about Penrose Tiling – the wonderfully aesthetic effects of joining basic geometric shapes and studying their behaviours towards infinity.
I thought of ‘where algebra, geometry and number theory don’t meet’ and felt nicely re-assured in my understanding.
But during my Yoga class earlier in the day I had thought about time, space and measuring.
For measuring is more than comparing.
Comparing is done in a multi-sensorial way,
as we see patterns that we enjoy or don’t
hear sounds that please or don’t
sense smells that we like or not
and feel the experience of touch – with pleasure or with pain.
Comparing rationally, intellectually, mathematically and metrologically
is done either through charts that appeal to our visual experience
or the statistical way with numbers – built on theories and theorems.
Roger Penrose touched on things that are ‘forbidden, for a theorem says so’.
Yet evidence before our eyes shows us contrariwise.
Hence I’m not alone with thoughts about data- and evidence-based science
to evolve from theory-based experiments
to data-based science with sensors that build a smarter planet.
For space is not only the plane on which our feet rest,
it is the room in which our planet rotates and circulates
and it is the space that is the universe:
too large to imagine, too wide to encompass,
too far to travel.
Except in our imagination!
In our mindspace we travel the universe every night with our ‘dream machine’.
And thus time is not a 4th dimension, but part of our experience of space and moving
in, on and above it.
As Giordano Bruno said before he was burnt on the stake:
There is no time, there is only movement.
For if there was no movement, there would be no time.
Measuring time is one challenge.
Measuring space another.
The tools are numbers, associated with measuring units.
My software allows for defining and discovering new metric units,
beyond ‘time is money’
and beyond second, meter, kilogram
as the fundamentals for measuring units.
As a result, we can measure on-screen what can’t be measured with physical instruments in physical space and current understanding of time along a time line.
Quantifying means numbering.
Measuring means combining numbers with metric units.
People need metrics to make decisions.
They want predictions and trends for the future of time;
but can’t even measure the growth of the volume of a baby in nine months!
Would that they tried my software methods!
Would that they used them to explore the data of their daily experience
to deepen and expand their knowledge about their surroundings.
For it’s time for humanity to wake up to the space of our home:
the only planet there is.
Why on earth should we destroy with yet more wars and other destructive actions, when we could sing, scream and shout that we’re all wonderful people???
Related articles
- Singularity 1 on 1: Consciousness is More than Computation! (ieet.org)
- Prof Roger Penrose to give lecture in October to mark Irish eureka moment (irishtimes.com)
- Small Space, Big Style (wayfair.com)
- Cycles of Physicists – A conversation with Sir Roger Penrose (ideasroadshow.wordpress.com)
- Physicists Discover Geometry Underlying Particle Physics | Simons Foundation (simonsfoundation.org)
- Penrose tile floors (makezine.com)
- John Hagelin: 1. Consciousness & Quantum Physics ~ Reality is an illusion 2. Sir Roger Penrose – The quantum nature of consciousness (evolutionarymystic.wordpress.com)
- Quantification logic and generalizations (amosandgromar.wordpress.com)
- Exquisite Geometry Sculpted From Paper, Not Stone (fastcodesign.com)
- Physicists Discover Geometry Underlying Particle Physics (science.slashdot.org)
Tagged: Giordano Bruno, Measurement, Number theory, Penrose Tiling, Physics, Roger Penrose, Royal Institution, Space
Very good, Sabine. I so enjoy your writing and thinking. -Bruce
Thank You, Bruce,
it seems to take one to know one!
🙂
Are you familiar with our work (lifted out of this page at 12c):
http://doublings.wordpress.com/2014/05/08/15/
May 2014: Discovering Quanta Magazine, amplituhedrons and more
We have been discovering the writings of Natalie Wolchover within Quanta Magazine where she focuses on the work of Andrew Hodges (Oxford), Jacob Bourjaily (Harvard) and Jeremy England (MIT). We believe these young academics are opening important doors so our simple work that began in and around December 2011 has a larger, current scientific context, not just simple mathematics.
http://www.simonsfoundation.org/quanta/20130917-a-jewel-at-the-heart-of-quantum-physics/
http://www.simonsfoundation.org/quanta/20140122-a-new-physics-theory-of-life/
We’ll begin working on the source materials later today. -BEC
No, I didn’t know. But I’m glad I know now!
I just think that everybody ought to come to their own conclusions re ‘model of the universe’.
I hope to provide a ‘tool of investigation’ for that purpose, once my software designs have become functional code…
THANKS for getting in touch!